Monthly Archives: June 2018

China issues statement on Sino-US

Published by:

According to ECNS, Chinese and U.S. teams, led by Chinese Vice Premier Liu He and U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, held economic and trade consultations in Beijing from June 2-3, according to a statement issued by the Chinese side.

“To implement the consensus reached in Washington, the two sides have had good communication in various areas such as agriculture and energy, and have made positive and concrete progress while relevant details are yet to be confirmed by both sides,” the statement said.

Liu is also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, and chief of the Chinese side of the China-U.S. comprehensive economic dialogue.

“The attitude of the Chinese side remains consistent,” said the statement. To meet the people’s ever-growing needs for a better life and the requirements of high-quality economic development, China is willing to increase imports from other countries, including the United States, which will benefit people of both countries and the rest of the world, it noted.

“Reform and opening-up as well as expanding domestic demand are China’s national strategies. Our set pace will not change,” the statement said. The outcome of the talks should be based on the prerequisite that the two parties meet each other halfway and will not engage in a trade war, according to the statement.

“All economic and trade outcomes of the talks will not take effect if the US side imposes any trade sanctions including raising tariffs,” the statement said.

How China Issues affect Australia

Published by:

According to Australian Financial Review, for reasons ranging from social inclusion to international security, getting China policy right is the single most important challenge for Australian foreign policy.

Instead, the relationship is undergoing what the Prime Minister calls a “degree of tension”, and others describe as a deep chill. Although Canberra is now sending conciliatory signals, no progress is being made on any of the big issues on our agenda. Ciobo met only with local officials.

There’s nothing wrong with tension in bilateral relationships. The objective of foreign policy is to pursue interests and manage differences, not generate warm feelings.

But the present problems are not the result of formal policy positions. The Turnbull government’s declaratory policy towards China is basically the same as every Australian government this century.

As its white paper stated, we welcome China’s rise and accept that it will want greater influence. We do not seek to change the nature of the Chinese state. In Ciobo’s words, our relationship “is anchored in respect for our respective histories and worldviews”.

Mess of contradictions
But we want to ensure that the region into which China rises is one in which all voices are heard and where agreed rules, whether of maritime law or trade, are followed, Mcdovoice customer satisfaction survey.

The source of the difficulties lies at the operational rather than declaratory level. It is not the fault of any single minister. Policy towards China is compartmentalized, domestically focused and uncoordinated.

Differences between and within the defense, security, economic and foreign policy agencies are unusually persistent in consensus-driven Canberra. In some quarters, hard-headed opposition to China is becoming a proxy measure of loyalty to the US alliance.

Messages to Beijing and our other international partners which need to be clear and consistent diverge substantially.

Ciobo says Australia “welcomes the contribution” China’s Belt and Road initiative can make to regional infrastructure, but the broader weight of message is that this is part of a China-driven geopolitical effort to control the Indo-Pacific and that Australia will work to establish alternative schemes.